Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	65% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180501
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '18 at 06:47
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 221 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 682 67% 549 Pts	64-Core 1133 70% 1133 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6769) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65% Good	Lighting 80.8 Reflection 79.5 Parallax 68.9 66% 76.4 fps	MRender 79.4 Gravity 75.3 Splatting 77.2 63% 77.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,849 Write 1,335 Mixed 551 273% 1,245 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 39.9 143% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 398 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 372 275% 364 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 416GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 461 459 461 464 468 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 468 Mixed 401 SusWrite 460 102% 450 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 44.5 142% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 340 255% 341 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 134%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 96GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 91 91 91 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 101 Write 93.1 Mixed 61 SusWrite 90.6 64% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46 4,039 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 153GB free Firmware: P22OABEA SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 63 64 63 64 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 73.6 Write 63.5 Mixed 43.6 SusWrite 63.7 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 39%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 592GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 150 152 152 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 153 Mixed 88.6 SusWrite 150 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1.5TB 2,135 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1.5TB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 36.1 Write 36.5 Mixed 23 SusWrite 37 45% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 20,017 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 42.5 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 34.8 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.3 SC Write 35.7 SC Mixed 26.8 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)