Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-9000e APU (2016 M.SR) 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 49.6 35% 49.5 Pts	4-Core 47.8 8-Core 48.5 6% 48.2 Pts	64-Core 47.9 3% 47.9 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 8330) 80MB Ram: 80MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.55% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 4 Parallax 2.41 1% 2.68 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 2.91 2% 2.35 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.55% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB 32,443 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	251x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	155x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	97x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	22x
SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 2,836 samples	16x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	63x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 13,712 samples	49x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	44x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16