Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 49.3 1-Core 16 2-Core 23.8 23% 29.7 Pts	4-Core 32.1 8-Core 32.3 4% 32.2 Pts	64-Core 32.3 2% 32.3 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0602) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.17 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.09 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2M080G2GN 73GB 273 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102HD SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 59 70 75 53 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 207 Write 78.6 Mixed 97.5 SusWrite 61.4 24% 111 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 20.3 4K Mixed 8.3 36% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 65.3 DQ Write 55.4 DQ Mixed 58.7 44% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB 7,983 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 5 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 4 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 163 24% 163 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 2x2GBKingstonBench 38%, 1,037 samples	5x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	4x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	3x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $148

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16