Asrock 970 Performance/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance/3.1  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '18 at 10:09
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 147
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 434
45% 360 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8426) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 3.5
4% 4.5 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 3.48
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 285 302 277 291 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 400
Write 394
Mixed 317
SusWrite 287
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 32.5
120% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 137
127% 194 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 105%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
142GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 57 56 58 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 51.8
Mixed 40
SusWrite 56.7
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 35%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 131 130 131 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 130
Mixed 122
SusWrite 130
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
380GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 101 102 101 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 86.2
Write 87.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 101
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
699GB free
Firmware: CC94
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 68 69 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 75.3
Write 22.2
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 66.2
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance/3.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $570
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback