Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 196 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 491 48% 397 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.89 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Lighting 26.7 Reflection 24.4 Parallax 35.2 22% 28.7 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 30 Splatting 22.3 23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 456GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 119 94 96 97 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 512 Write 224 Mixed 312 SusWrite 149 66% 299 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 22 78% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 180 151% 215 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron-002C 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9E1 2x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	58% Above average	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 19.4 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16