PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 9.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DG3/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131118 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 19 '18 at 02:07 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
71.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
9.81%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AEG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 69 68 71 72 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
846GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 200 206 211 212 216 MB/s
|
118%
Outstanding
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 32GB-$15
20GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 13 11 12 13 12 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 21x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 18x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 21x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $113 |