| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 6.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 550P5C/550P7C (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890 |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140617 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 19 '18 at 01:23 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.3%
Below average
|
35% 60.8 Pts
|
28% 223 Pts
|
19% 307 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
|
6.7%
Terrible
|
6% 7.33 fps
|
9% 10.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 69 68 71 65 77 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
24% 109 MB/s
|
38% 14.4 MB/s
|
77% 167 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
46.4%
Average
|
53% 18.6 GB/s
|
18% 6.43 GB/s
|
21% 191 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 550P5C/550P7C Builds (Compare 599 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 550P5C/550P7C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 313x |
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 151x |
| Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples | 106x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 477x |
| GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples | 85x |
| GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples | 35x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $448 |