Asus SABERTOOTH P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH P67  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 19 '18 at 00:32
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 197
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 390
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
MSI(1462 1542) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
8.05% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 3.72
9% 8.28 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 6.65
6% 7.76 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.05%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 72 72 70 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 326
Write 82.7
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 67.4
31% 143 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 15.6
63% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 88.7
DQ Write 27.9
DQ Mixed 12
21% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 53%
WD Green 750GB (2009)-$224
331GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 73 71 73 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48% Average
Read 95.6
Write 78.9
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 71.4
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48%
Great: 58%
Generic USB SD Reader 8GB
7GB free, PID 0330
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 5.7 10 10 9.9 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 6.2
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 9
9% 7.82 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 12%
CCR-70 8GB
1GB free, PID e0ed
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.1 6.2 6.2 6.1 6.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 4.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.1
9% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM3X1G1600C8D 029E CM3X1G1600C8D 029E CM3X1G1600C8D 5GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH P67 Builds (Compare 1,262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH P67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $599
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback