Lenovo 2776N1G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2776N1G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2776N1G
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '16 at 02:54
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo U9400
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Memory 47.6
1-Core 11.2
2-Core 21.7
21% 26.8 Pts
4-Core 21.2
8-Core 21.6
3% 21.4 Pts
64-Core 21.8
1% 21.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 20E4) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2555
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.51 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.56 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAA256MAG 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.7% Below average
Read 248
Write 139
Mixed 181
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 3.88
41% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 44.3
DQ Write 35.6
DQ Mixed 11.8
16% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.8
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback