Asus P7H55D-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7H55D-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 20:42
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 149
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 202
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 37.1
32% 33.1 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 35.7
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 27 55 47 16 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 246
Write 101
Mixed 136
SusWrite 31.5
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 17.1
69% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 18.6
15% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 90%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
268GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 77
Write 78.5
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 57.6
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HTS543225L9SA00 250GB-$41
188GB free
Firmware: FBEOC43C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 33 55 49 17 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 58.7
Write 50
Mixed 31
SusWrite 33.8
32% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55D-M PRO Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $391
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback