PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Acer Aspire M7810 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer FMP55 |
Memory | 2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20091215 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 18 '18 at 16:35 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.61
|
4.56%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 112 125 70 68 MB/s
|
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
47GB free
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 113 139 136 171 138 MB/s
|
47.6%
Average
|
|||
JMicron Generic 500GB
36GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 14x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 4x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $498 |