Acer Aspire M7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M7810  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FMP55
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 16:35
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 108
57% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 356
33% 277 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.61
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 5.78
4% 5.29 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 4.73
Splatting 8.3
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 112 125 70 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 182
Write 155
Mixed 122
SusWrite 110
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 14.7
47% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 70.7
DQ Write 67.8
DQ Mixed 49.9
43% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 51%
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
47GB free
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 113 139 136 171 138 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 243
Write 231
Mixed 217
SusWrite 146
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 22.3
79% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 114
84% 104 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 93%
JMicron Generic 500GB
36GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 26.7
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 27
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M7810 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $498
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback