User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ERGOUK
Motherboard	Intel DH61CR
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '18 at 10:43
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 145 68% 109 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 230 31% 231 Pts	64-Core 228 14% 228 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3870 554 User benchmarks, average bench 6% PwrHis(1787 2244) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 5% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor STM3160211AS 160GB 1,528 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 55 54 61 67 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 66.8 Write 64 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 57 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 40%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30 4,341 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 122GB free Firmware: FBEOC40C SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 36.5 Mixed 23 SusWrite 28.8 23% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 36%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 141GB free Firmware: 04.01G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 45 45 45 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	26% Poor	Read 46.2 Write 46 Mixed 31.4 SusWrite 44.1 31% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 34%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99 3,154 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 17GB free Firmware: FB2OC40C SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 31 32 31 31 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 56.7 Write 55.7 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 31.6 32% 43.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Vulcan-2400 859B CT51264BA1339.C16F 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.5% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 20.2 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)