Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 05:10
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 417
42% 343 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.3% Very good
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 106
Parallax 90.8
81% 98.8 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 91.3
Splatting 94.1
76% 92.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 41 90 97 22 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 270
Write 97.5
Mixed 117
SusWrite 78.6
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 16.5
66% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 29.3
DQ Mixed 16.8
14% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
232GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 112 113 115 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 120
Write 110
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 112
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 146 134 148 137 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 154
Write 156
Mixed 16
SusWrite 140
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1866C10 F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.5% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback