HP Z200 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Z200 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B40h
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100506
Uptime	8.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '18 at 01:50
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3460 780 User benchmarks, average bench 68% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 163 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 294 39% 294 Pts	64-Core 293 18% 293 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.01% Terrible	Lighting 4.93 Reflection 7.04 Parallax 1.66 4% 4.54 fps	MRender 7.14 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 4.39 4% 5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.01% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 217 220 216 218 216 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.6% Good	Read 225 Write 221 Mixed 217 SusWrite 210 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 26.6 97% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 39GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 18 19 20 20 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.03% Terrible	Read 28.7 Write 18.5 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 17.8 28% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.6 35% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.03% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F 44GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 14.2 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 Workstation

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	58x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	37x
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples	29x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	19x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	17x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 48GBUnknownBench 25%, 15 samples	7x
ID:00 00 ID:00 00 44GBUnknownBench 26%, 101 samples	6x
ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 52GBUnknownBench 30%, 14 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16