Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '18 at 20:23
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 73.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 235 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 758 73% 602 Pts	64-Core 1,238 77% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 150 Reflection 194 Parallax 173 122% 172 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 176 Splatting 127 116% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 171 175 174 170 168 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 417 Write 406 Mixed 331 SusWrite 198 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 46.7 158% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 357 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235 6,443 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 3TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 186 187 183 183 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 178 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 185 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 197% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 121%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 900GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 90 94 92 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 93.5 Write 84.3 Mixed 49 SusWrite 92.6 58% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 57%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 123 122 122 123 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 124 Write 112 Mixed 80 SusWrite 122 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 870GB free Firmware: HP23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 109 110 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 108 Write 108 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 109 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 70%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4TB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 160 154 151 157 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 126 Write 134 Mixed 72 SusWrite 156 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.3 226% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 99%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1TB free Firmware: SC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 113 112 111 114 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 154 Write 151 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 112 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC4H SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 158 149 155 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 132 Write 91.8 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 152 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 2x16GB 1,959 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	96% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 36 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 23.8 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 94.5 42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	114x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16