Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T7500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0D881F
Memory	43.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '18 at 19:12
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5560 659 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 160 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 528 51% 420 Pts	64-Core 739 46% 739 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 75%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 784GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 353 355 360 364 348 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 364 Write 344 Mixed 344 SusWrite 360 80% 353 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 37.2 120% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 224 169% 225 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 133%
Corsair Voyager SliderX1 61GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2GB free, PID 1a15 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 0.1 20 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.65% Terrible	Read 29.8 Write 24.3 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 17.9 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 34% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.65% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x8GB 2,890 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 6 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 24.8 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 8.4 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples	163x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	88x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	74x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16