| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180419 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 17 '18 at 12:33 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.8%
Good
|
67% 117 Pts
|
50% 419 Pts
|
33% 534 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
60.5%
Good
|
63% 81.4 fps
|
55% 68.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 254 252 196 152 149 MB/s
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
77% 341 MB/s
|
148% 54.3 MB/s
|
180% 275 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
507GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 144 163 165 165 165 MB/s
|
90%
Excellent
|
94% 129 MB/s
|
147% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
96.6%
Outstanding
|
102% 35.6 GB/s
|
79% 27.6 GB/s
|
45% 88.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 266 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 33x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 25x |
| Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $98Bench 68%, 93,718 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 22x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $162 |