| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q SE (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20080820 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 17 '18 at 08:21 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
33.7%
Below average
|
35% 54 Pts
|
9% 70.3 Pts
|
4% 69.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
|
20.6%
Poor
|
20% 27.9 fps
|
21% 25 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 51 26 53 54 56 MB/s
|
40.2%
Average
|
49% 67.1 MB/s
|
150% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
7GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 23 24 MB/s
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
33% 25 MB/s
|
70% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
USB Flash Memory 16GB
8GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 4 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.6 MB/s
|
4.76%
Terrible
|
12% 10.2 MB/s
|
26% 1.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14%
Very poor
|
13% 4.47 GB/s
|
11% 3.83 GB/s
|
28% 141 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q SE Builds (Compare 103 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q SE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 16x |
| Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 8x |
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 5x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $199 |