Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m3-7Y30 4,585 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 57.5 2-Core 120 50% 82.2 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 188 23% 177 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 11,115 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Lighting 6.07 Reflection 8.85 Parallax 5.81 5% 6.91 fps	MRender 6.62 Gravity 4.27 Splatting 11.3 6% 7.38 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 128GB 1,868 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: QHY11A SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 196 271 197 184 199 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.5% Below average	Read 108 Write 117 Mixed 124 SusWrite 201 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 6.3 40% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 63.6 77% 133 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 90%
MXT-USB Storage Device 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 976GB free, PID 8816 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 10 13 14 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	6.4% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 2.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 11.6 10% 8.38 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.4% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	61.5% Good	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 21.3 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 16.5 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16