Toshiba Satellite A665

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite A665 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA NWQAA
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '18 at 22:54
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 105 58% 88.9 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 219 26% 200 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M 8,303 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD30) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.54 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB 24,911 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF36 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 124 128 136 146 144 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34% Below average	Read 225 Write 178 Mixed 172 SusWrite 135 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 10.8 41% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 73.4 DQ Mixed 27.6 38% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 56%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 383GB free Firmware: JEDO SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 80 81 79 82 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 80.7 Write 71.7 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 81 50% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 25,458 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite A665 Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A665

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	30x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	23x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	20x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	65x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	34x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
480GB 480GBNetacBench 69%, 1,056 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	24x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	11x
TSB1066D3S7DR8/2G 2x2GBKingstonBench 25%, 367 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $218

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16