HP 700-209eb

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP 700-209eb  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140325
Uptime27 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 19:08
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User LUX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 109
2-Core 199
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 581
56% 463 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 10.3
7% 9.3 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 7.97
Splatting 8.3
7% 8.09 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 77 71 74 74 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 16.2
Write 112
Mixed 31
SusWrite 73.1
42% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback