Biostar TA970 Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TA970 Plus  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150130
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 18:35
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 113
55% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 379
37% 302 Pts
64-Core 364
23% 364 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 31.5
29% 30.6 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 32.1
28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 126 124 121 119 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 453
Write 254
Mixed 196
SusWrite 124
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 20.1
82% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 55.8
DQ Mixed 77.2
65% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 93%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
320GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 84 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 78.2
Write 91
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 84.3
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 62%
HitachiG ST 2TB
128GB free, PID 1015
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 82 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 81.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 81.3
98% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.1% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA970 Plus Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA970 Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback