Asus H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '16 at 03:10
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3220-$36 19,337 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 181 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 180 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.13% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 3.34 2% 3.07 fps	MRender 5.33 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.87 3% 3.45 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.13% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 7657476 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -131340099901301 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2545 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 268 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 78 94494392354 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7657476 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7657476 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7657476 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8315 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6320 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6320 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8841	37.2% Below average	Read 180 Write 99.6 Mixed 124 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 11.6 76% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 64.2 DQ Mixed 9.18 16% 29.5 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 83%
Samsung HD754JJ 750GB 741 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 691GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 1 1 41051 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 71 67 8875 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5431 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8460 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3223 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 70 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 52 206159937572 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 68 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5540	81.6% Excellent	Read 134 Write 150 Mixed 144 108% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 2.72 4K Mixed 0.65 157% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 290GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 149 138 3550 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 529 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 213 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 134 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 12 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1928 (C2) HDA temperature 107 103 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	68% Good	Read 120 Write 116 Mixed 104 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 2.55 4K Mixed 0.28 118% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair VS2GB1333D4 2x2GB 889 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 15.6 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.2 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	460x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	300x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	201x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	172x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16