Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 175 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 338 41% 316 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 372 380 374 154 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 385 Write 384 Mixed 276 SusWrite 291 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 35 116% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 328 249% 335 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 873GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 108 111 110 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	63% Good	Read 109 Write 99.9 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 111 70% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 2x4GB 2,152 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 17.4 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.6 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	24x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	5x
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 4x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 327 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $231

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16