Asrock Z170 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 02:02
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 155
2-Core 310
101% 186 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 585
79% 590 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 160
Parallax 138
130% 153 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 150
Splatting 119
106% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 118%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1083 1070 1146 1177 1183 1169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,889
Write 1,363
Mixed 830
SusWrite 1,138
291% 1,305 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 64.2
249% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1239
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 457
431% 696 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 257%
Great: 283%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 960GB-$300
501GB free
Firmware: X212T0RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 417 462 470 476 479 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 446
Mixed 273
SusWrite 453
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 40
156% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 157
171% 288 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
119GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 180 180 191 184 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 433
Write 179
Mixed 219
SusWrite 184
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 14.9
112% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 28.5
46% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 72%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
782GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 117 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 97.5
Write 122
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 116
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 76%
BUFFALO HD-PNFU3 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 027f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 119 120 119 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 119
134% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB-$70
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 24.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Gaming-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $732
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback