Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 44 2-Core 130 53% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 272 30% 236 Pts	64-Core 287 18% 287 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	8.75% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 13.5 Parallax 13.6 8% 12.3 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 9.07 Splatting 16.1 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.75% Great: 10%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 212 Write 147 Mixed 157 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 19.4 86% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 62.3 DQ Mixed 22.4 23% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 2GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 24.7 Write 5 Mixed 5.2 11% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	39.6% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.3 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $281

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16