Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '18 at 20:44
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 1,065
104% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,299
80% 1,299 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 108%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte GTX 1080-Ti
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 196
Parallax 195
147% 191 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 175
Splatting 123
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1721 921 619 623 623 623 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,548
Write 2,151
Mixed 1,266
SusWrite 855
380% 1,705 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 88.1
292% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,245
DQ Write 935
DQ Mixed 1,068
804% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 294%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
507GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 493 495 494 494 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 470
Mixed 392
SusWrite 494
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 65
218% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
597GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 87 85 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 76.3
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 86.2
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 57%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
729GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 98 97 99 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 113
Write 118
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 103
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130
3.5TB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 154 155 154 161 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 96 96 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 115
Write 95.5
Mixed 77
SusWrite 94.8
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 29.6
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 31.2
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,049
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback