Toshiba SATELLITE L850-1MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L850-1MT  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120924
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 15 '18 at 18:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 88.7
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 104
56% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 158
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.151.0.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 3.88
Parallax 3.47
0% 2.46 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 3.17
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 55 59 54 55 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 85.2
Write 86.7
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 55
47% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 5.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback