Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '18 at 03:09
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 161
2-Core 318
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 975
97% 793 Pts
64-Core 1,288
80% 1,288 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 148
Parallax 127
112% 138 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 133
Splatting 107
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,451
Write 1,472
Mixed 1,263
381% 1,729 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 87.6
296% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 1,020
776% 1,039 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
63GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 114 117 140 118 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.4% Good
Read 255
Write 200
Mixed 231
SusWrite 121
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 41.5
138% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 174
125% 157 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 84%
Adata S510 120GB
35GB free
Firmware: 3.3.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 93 101 100 98 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.9% Good
Read 156
Write 123
Mixed 137
SusWrite 95.3
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 36
145% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 114
89% 122 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 79%
WD 5000AA External 500GB
182GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 43 42 43 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 37
Write 40.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 41.9
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 22%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 32GB-$5
28GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 109
Write 52.7
Mixed 25
SusWrite 11.6
54% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
102% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2472 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 24.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback