Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A54h
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110817
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '18 at 22:30
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7300-$28 7,475 User benchmarks, average bench 39% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 22 2-Core 38.7 33% 43.6 Pts	4-Core 40.9 8-Core 43.5 6% 42.2 Pts	64-Core 44 3% 44 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 45%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RAID0 640GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 581GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 33 43 43 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	21.9% Poor	Read 35.3 Write 52.8 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 40.7 27% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37GB 3,950 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 2.7 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium D 2.80GHzIntelBench 29%, 3,782 samples	8x
Core2 6300Intel $40Bench 34%, 5,234 samples	5x
Core2 4300Intel $70Bench 33%, 2,455 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	3x

SSD
SSD2SC240G1SA754D117-459P 240GBPNYBench 80%, 154 samples	3x
LCT-128M3S 2.5 7mm 128GBLiteonitBench 67%, 256 samples	1x
Sata III 127GBIntensoBench 72%, 2,962 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16