Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '18 at 20:54
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 108
56% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 333
35% 280 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.5% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 56.1
37% 43.7 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 37.3
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 512GB-$349
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 416 418 424 401 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 418
Mixed 291
SusWrite 409
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 39.7
144% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 254
190% 254 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
337GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 114 112 113 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 119
Write 116
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 112
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
582GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 108
Write 99
Mixed 72
SusWrite 87.5
68% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 13.4
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback