HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8261
Memory	21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180622
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '18 at 20:01
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	60%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 79 1-Core 118 2-Core 211 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 583 58% 473 Pts	64-Core 594 37% 594 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% HP(103C 8261) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.96 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Lighting 99.1 Reflection 119 Parallax 91.7 81% 103 fps	MRender 95.1 Gravity 93.4 Splatting 104 80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 421 333 250 251 252 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 376 Write 422 Mixed 350 SusWrite 313 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 35.2 119% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 323 245% 329 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 98%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 102 100 98 106 91 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 51 Write 106 Mixed 60 SusWrite 102 59% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 231% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 859B CT8G4SFD824A.C16FDD2 24GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 17 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,725x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	1,633x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	1,146x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,153x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	987x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	812x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	468x
MZNTY128HDHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 4,948 samples	214x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	188x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	340x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	307x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	292x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16