| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 18.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H81M-HDS (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140702 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 13 '18 at 19:50 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.2%
Excellent
|
81% 140 Pts
|
61% 487 Pts
|
35% 560 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
|
32.2%
Below average
|
33% 36.5 fps
|
31% 37.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 44 1.3 66 45 36 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
17% 76.2 MB/s
|
30% 8.27 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
162GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 56 56 56 56 MB/s
|
41.6%
Average
|
52% 70.1 MB/s
|
145% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 148 149 149 150 152 MB/s
|
84.6%
Excellent
|
93% 128 MB/s
|
188% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3L/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
60.4%
Good
|
59% 20.6 GB/s
|
53% 18.6 GB/s
|
68% 59 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,129 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 173x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 158x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 100x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 133x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 74x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 57x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $325 |