Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '18 at 09:48
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 854
86% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,128
70% 1,128 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4944
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.33% Terrible
Lighting 8.63
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 8.72
7% 10 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 7.77
Splatting 17.3
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.33%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.4% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 74.2
64% 81.5 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 98.3
79% 96.9 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,194
Write 1,511
Mixed 1,964
420% 1,890 MB/s
4K Read 186
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 174
596% 177 MB/s
DQ Read 1113
DQ Write 994
DQ Mixed 1,043
785% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 302% Great: 559%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
161GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 101 99 100 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 398
Mixed 383
SusWrite 103
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59.6
206% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 352
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 178 178 179 181 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 390
Mixed 404
SusWrite 179
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 60.7
200% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
169GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 80 80 79 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 133
Write 119
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 77.6
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
586GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 99 93 97 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 178
Write 133
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 98.6
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 33.2
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 31.3
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 112%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC) Builds (Compare 3,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,262
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback