Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '18 at 03:16
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% , 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 81.1 1-Core 127 2-Core 254 85% 154 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 866 82% 681 Pts	64-Core 1,609 100% 1,609 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 168 Parallax 138 130% 155 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 145 Splatting 123 106% 130 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 1140 1032 1027 1084 1019 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 1,862 Write 1,594 Mixed 824 SusWrite 1,036 297% 1,329 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 64.6 231% 90.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,292 DQ Write 1,039 DQ Mixed 1,062 823% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 353%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 839GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 165 155 162 155 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 154 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 158 96% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 107%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 94 96 92 86 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 75.5 Write 97.5 Mixed 60 SusWrite 89.2 59% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.1 36% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 100%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 167 169 168 169 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 168 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 169 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.4 168% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 178 166 171 176 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 156 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 172 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.4 192% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 184 171 171 174 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 168 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 173 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.2 249% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 162 170 164 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 170 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 165 102% 141 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 376% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 109%
WD WD8001FFWX-68J1UN0 8TB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 172 157 162 164 157 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 160 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 163 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 216% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 61.2 MC Mixed 35.1 124% 43.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 10 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	67x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	57x
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	62x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	32x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	21x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	60x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	27x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,593

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16