Biostar X370GT5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar X370GT5  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 16:15
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 243
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 482
64% 482 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB; zotac mini
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 33
Parallax 39.1
33% 37.7 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 37.8
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 380 392 323 389 386 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 452
Mixed 401
SusWrite 367
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 45.7
146% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 339
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
235GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 91 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 49.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 91.4
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 58%
Maxtor 6V300F0 300GB
14GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 32.8
Write 45.8
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 40.8
27% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.1
149% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.4% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370GT5 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar X370GT5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $280
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback