Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 08:23
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 272
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 758
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PowerColor(148C 2385) 2GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 29.3
18% 27.1 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 22
Splatting 33.1
24% 28.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130
913GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 385 324 368 321 366 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 401
Write 309
Mixed 366
SusWrite 352
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 34.9
127% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 247
212% 313 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 190 195 194 193 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 183
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 193
107% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
4TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 156 157 157 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 160
Write 168
Mixed 130
SusWrite 156
209% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
3TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 138 139 140 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 130
Write 133
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 139
164% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 60%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
106GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 38.8
Write 39.4
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 39.3
54% 39 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 14
1,133% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 20.8
DQ Mixed 16.4
1,317% 17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 20.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $950
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback