PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming (all builds) |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180309 |
Uptime | 6.9 Days |
Run Date | Aug 11 '18 at 08:23 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
92.5%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PowerColor(148C 2385) 2GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
|
20%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130
913GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 385 324 368 321 366 MB/s
|
92.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 190 195 194 193 194 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
4TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 156 157 157 156 MB/s
|
65.7%
Good
|
|||
WD Elements 107C 4TB
3TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 138 139 140 140 MB/s
|
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
106GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
|
72.4%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
75.1%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 983x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 325x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 164x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 255x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 242x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 210x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $950 |