MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7A39
Motherboard	MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180427
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '18 at 08:14
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	93%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 41.1 1-Core 35 2-Core 84.5 31% 53.5 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 290 26% 221 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.8% Poor	Lighting 33.9 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 37.1 28% 33.9 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 36.3 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 45 162 63 96 91 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.7% Poor	Read 203 Write 35.5 Mixed 65.2 SusWrite 115 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 8.7 40% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.3 DQ Write 17.7 DQ Mixed 15.9 12% 17 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 617GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 163 162 161 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 149 Mixed 90.7 SusWrite 161 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 219% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965684-005.A00G 1x8GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	32% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 12.5 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	38x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	29x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	8x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $235

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16