Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory30.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 07:50
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$290
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
SC Int 111
SC Float 121
SC Mixed 115
92% 116 Pts
QC Int 444
QC Float 476
QC Mixed 461
104% 460 Pts
MC Int 1,279
MC Float 1,328
MC Mixed 1,321
196% 1,309 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$249
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 122
Reflection 156
Parallax 162
42% 146 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 202
Splatting 154
70% 164 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 53 49 53 53 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 512
Write 449
Mixed 384
SusWrite 47.9
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 38.1
135% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 202
192% 300 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 96%
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB
204GB free
Firmware: Z3106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 53 53 74 44 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 171
Write 203
Mixed 197
SusWrite 54.4
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 8.5
30% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 28
78% 166 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 49 51 65 53 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46% Average
Read 109
Write 124
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 51.5
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46%
Great: 84%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$53
558GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 44 44 57 51 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 113
Write 119
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 46.7
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$130
364GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 45 45 58 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 85.7
Write 48.3
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 47.6
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CL17-17-17 D4-2400 CL16-16-16 D4-2400 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.3% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 25
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 76%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 3,688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $1,098
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $329Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback