Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 02:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3770-$374
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
SC Int 105
SC Float 107
SC Mixed 105
84% 105 Pts
QC Int 381
QC Float 384
QC Mixed 350
84% 371 Pts
MC Int 520
MC Float 520
MC Mixed 529
78% 523 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$1,096
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Lighting 300
Reflection 276
Parallax 302
93% 293 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 272
Splatting 178
91% 210 fps
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92%
Great: 113%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$207
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 173 67 33 30 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.3% Above average
Read 221
Write 212
Mixed 194
SusWrite 91.8
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 33
109% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 39.5
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 49.6
41% 58 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$301
76GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 213 209 209 209 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.5% Above average
Read 232
Write 221
Mixed 212
SusWrite 212
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 33.2
108% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 36.7
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 48
39% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 135%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
642GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 97 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 95.1
Write 96.4
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 96.8
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,309
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $172SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback