Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120301
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 01:46
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 200
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 514
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.3% Very good
Lighting 99.1
Reflection 106
Parallax 93.7
81% 99.7 fps
MRender 83.8
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 75.3
68% 83.3 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 149 54 36 34 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.6% Above average
Read 225
Write 212
Mixed 194
SusWrite 85.8
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 32.5
108% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 38.4
DQ Write 84.3
DQ Mixed 47.9
40% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
76GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 216 211 211 211 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.9% Above average
Read 220
Write 210
Mixed 207
SusWrite 212
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 33.2
107% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36.4
DQ Write 75.9
DQ Mixed 47.7
39% 53.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
642GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 96 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 91.7
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 96.9
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback