| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180419 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 11 '18 at 01:38 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 30% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.6%
Good
|
60% 103 Pts
|
45% 370 Pts
|
30% 490 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.7%
Below average
|
29% 62.9 fps
|
52% 63.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 212 247 189 153 222 MB/s
|
50.2%
Above average
|
43% 191 MB/s
|
64% 26.2 MB/s
|
92% 167 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
511GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 163 163 160 161 160 MB/s
|
76.4%
Very good
|
83% 114 MB/s
|
156% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
80.1%
Excellent
|
85% 29.8 GB/s
|
61% 21.2 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 266 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 33x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 25x |
| Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $98Bench 68%, 93,718 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 22x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $162 |