Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '18 at 00:25
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Memory 72.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 698 73% 584 Pts	64-Core 662 41% 662 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.4% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 116 Parallax 99.1 87% 107 fps	MRender 93.3 Gravity 116 Splatting 102 85% 104 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 499 Write 425 Mixed 394 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 87.9 4K Mixed 43 148% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 321 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 246 207% 299 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 124GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 102 105 112 113 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 136 Write 103 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 104 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 28GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 148 156 161 151 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 148 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 158 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25 20,263 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	345x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	125x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	73x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	57x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	54x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	28x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	23x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16