| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20141125 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 10 '18 at 23:27 |
| Run Duration | 106 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59%
Above average
|
53% 82.4 Pts
|
29% 223 Pts
|
16% 251 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
EVGA(3842 1958) 2GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.3%
Poor
|
21% 25.6 fps
|
21% 26.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 129 137 135 129 MB/s
|
83.3%
Excellent
|
97% 132 MB/s
|
228% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.7%
Average
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
24% 8.57 GB/s
|
52% 76.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 531x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 263x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 255x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 157x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 94x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $134 |