Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime22.2 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 22:54
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.5% Very good
SC Int 93.2
SC Float 94.6
SC Mixed 87.1
73% 91.6 Pts
QC Int 389
QC Float 363
QC Mixed 374
85% 375 Pts
MC Int 720
MC Float 774
MC Mixed 758
112% 751 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550 Ti-$250
MSI(1462 2610) 1GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1075 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 31
10% 33.5 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 36.1
15% 35.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 13%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$296
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 450
Write 447
Mixed 340
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 39.6
134% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 218
196% 299 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 125%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
57GB free
Firmware: 070H
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 453
Write 255
Mixed 267
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 14.8
88% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 24.1
44% 86.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 73%
Wd2003fzex-00z4sa0 WD- 2TB
687GB free
Firmware: 01.04Q.6
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3282
Write 57.8
Mixed 111
826% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 610
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.2
25,914% 205 MB/s
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$28
346GB free
Firmware: 1AA01114
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 78
Write 84.2
Mixed 47
52% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
206% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$28
54GB free
Firmware: 1AA01114
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 49
Write 67
Mixed 40
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$282
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 34.1
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 120%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,468
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $172SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback