Asus P7H55-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 days ago, 5 days ago.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110104
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 22:33
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7 880
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52.2% Above average
SC Int 81.9
SC Float 87.4
SC Mixed 80.3
66% 83.2 Pts
QC Int 280
QC Float 316
QC Mixed 243
63% 279 Pts
MC Int 366
MC Float 394
MC Mixed 398
58% 386 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.52
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 59.9
35% 59.9 fps
Poor: 18% Great: 24%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$169
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 33 38 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P7H55-M PRO Builds (Compare 805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $310
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $325Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback