Asrock Z77 Performance

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Performance (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '18 at 19:42
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 95.9 1-Core 101 2-Core 202 78% 133 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 385 51% 384 Pts	64-Core 378 23% 378 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 37.6 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 34.6 31% 33.6 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 35.6 Splatting 33.4 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 123 120 139 117 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 130 Write 140 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 122 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.1 183% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 220GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 110 109 111 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 115 Write 116 Mixed 13.4 SusWrite 109 64% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2133 C9 2x4GB 304 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 23.4 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 19.9 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 54.4 74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Performance Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Performance

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	48x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	34x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	8x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	7x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16