| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20170724 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 10 '18 at 19:27 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.7%
Very good
|
78% 133 Pts
|
62% 504 Pts
|
40% 641 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.2%
Poor
|
26% 31.6 fps
|
26% 32.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
53% 243 MB/s
|
112% 42.5 MB/s
|
83% 146 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 186 187 184 186 186 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
104% 145 MB/s
|
161% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
73.1%
Very good
|
74% 25.9 GB/s
|
62% 21.8 GB/s
|
58% 68.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,487 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 680x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 539x |
| Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples | 101x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 206x |
| GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 105x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $107 |