Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '18 at 17:43
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$462 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% , 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 72.3 1-Core 127 2-Core 254 82% 151 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 855 83% 680 Pts	64-Core 1,729 107% 1,729 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB; MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio 11G CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 152 Reflection 161 Parallax 136 124% 150 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 177 Splatting 99.6 106% 133 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 335GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1247 1209 1275 1269 1246 1251 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	275% Outstanding	Read 2,035 Write 1,503 Mixed 838 SusWrite 1,250 314% 1,407 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 58.8 217% 84.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,299 DQ Write 985 DQ Mixed 1,042 806% 1,109 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 275% Great: 353%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 838GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 173 166 168 181 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 164 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 172 100% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 143 145 147 144 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 133 Write 138 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 145 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 100%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 182 180 169 165 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 189 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 175 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.9 239% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 190 187 188 189 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 180 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 189 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.7 233% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: T962 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 192 189 184 194 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 171 Mixed 75 SusWrite 188 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.7 223% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 190 193 188 194 195 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
WD WD8001FFWX-68J1UN0 8TB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 171 179 162 179 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 181 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 175 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.7 230% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 45.7 MC Mixed 27.3 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 9 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	67x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	57x
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	62x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	32x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	21x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	60x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	27x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,600

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16