ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI G33M (MS-7357)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	MICRO-STAR MS-7357
Motherboard	MSI G33M (MS-7357) (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100112
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '18 at 16:51
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 43.5 2-Core 86.7 45% 68.6 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 172 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 501ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 61 58 58 25 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.7% Below average	Read 155 Write 63.4 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 53.5 20% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 27.1 92% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 41 DQ Mixed 29.8 24% 33.3 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 87%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 25GB free Firmware: CP100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 72 73 73 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 79.9 Write 85.5 Mixed 54.6 SusWrite 73.2 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 43%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 64GB free Firmware: JF100-19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 48 48 48 47 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 67.4 Write 70 Mixed 46 SusWrite 48 43% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 42%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 15GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 25.4 Mixed 24 SusWrite 25.6 36% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 49%
Imation ImationFlashDriv 8GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 044e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	7.59% Terrible	Read 24.1 Write 11.1 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 10.9 15% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 30% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.59% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback